Civil Engineering Materials and Structural Design

Admixtures in Cement Concrete

Admixtures are materials other than cement, water and aggregates added to a concrete mix, either before or during mixing, to modify the properties of fresh or hardened concrete. They are added in small quantities and are classified as follows:

1. Accelerating Admixtures These speed up the setting and early strength gain of concrete. Common examples are calcium chloride (CaCl₂), triethanolamine and soluble formates. Uses: Cold-weather concreting, early removal of formwork, rapid repair works, and emergency construction where early strength is required. Calcium chloride should not be used in prestressed concrete or where reinforcement corrosion is a concern.

2. Retarding Admixtures These delay the setting time of concrete. Examples are sugar, molasses, lignosulphonic acids and their salts, and tartaric acid. Uses: Hot-weather concreting, long-distance transportation of concrete, large pours to avoid cold joints, and grouting works where extended workability is needed.

3. Water-Reducing Admixtures (Plasticizers) These reduce the water requirement for a given workability, or increase workability at the same water-cement ratio. Examples are lignosulphonates and hydroxylated carboxylic acids. Uses: To obtain higher strength by reducing water content, to achieve high slump for pumping and placing in congested reinforcement, and to reduce cement content for economy.

4. Superplasticizers (High-Range Water Reducers) These are high-range water reducers giving 20–30% water reduction. Examples are sulphonated melamine formaldehyde and sulphonated naphthalene formaldehyde. Uses: Production of flowing concrete, self-compacting concrete, high-strength concrete, and placement in heavily reinforced or inaccessible sections.

5. Air-Entraining Admixtures These introduce tiny air bubbles in concrete. Examples are vinsol resin, animal fats and alkyl sulphonates. Uses: To improve workability and durability against freezing and thawing, and to reduce bleeding and segregation. They are widely used in road and bridge construction in cold climates.

6. Set-Accelerating and Hardening Accelerators These accelerate strength development without necessarily affecting setting time. Uses: Precast concrete production and cold-weather construction.

7. Mineral Admixtures (Supplementary Cementitious Materials) These are added in larger quantities to improve durability and economy. Examples are fly ash, silica fume, rice husk ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Uses: To reduce heat of hydration, improve workability, increase long-term strength, reduce permeability, and make concrete more durable and economical.

8. Miscellaneous Admixtures These include:

• Grouting admixtures — for filling voids and cracks.
• Corrosion-inhibiting admixtures — to protect steel reinforcement.
• Alkali-aggregate reaction inhibitors — to control expansive reactions.
• Colouring admixtures — for decorative concrete.
• Fungicidal, germicidal and insecticidal admixtures — for special environments.
• Gas-forming admixtures — to produce lightweight concrete.
• Bonding admixtures — to improve bond between old and new concrete.

Conclusion Admixtures are essential for producing concrete with desired properties such as improved workability, controlled setting, higher strength, better durability and economy. The type and dosage should be selected based on the requirement of the work and tested before use.

Key Properties of Civil Engineering Construction Materials Affecting Appearance, Strength, Durability and Serviceability

1. Affecting Appearance

• Colour and texture — surface finish, uniformity of shade, and grain determine the visual quality of exposed surfaces (brickwork, stone cladding, concrete finish).
• Surface texture and workability of finish — smoothness, porosity and ability to take plaster, paint or polish.
• Shape and size regularity — well-shaped, uniform units give neat, straight joints and a pleasing elevation.
• Freedom from defects — cracks, patches, efflorescence, honeycombing and stains spoil appearance.

2. Affecting Strength

• Compressive strength — the primary property for load-bearing members (bricks, concrete, stone).
• Tensile and shear strength — governs resistance to cracking, bending and shear (steel reinforcement, concrete).
• Bond strength — adhesion between mortar and unit, and between concrete and reinforcement, controls composite action.
• Modulus of elasticity / stiffness — governs deformation and deflection under load.
• Hardness and toughness — resistance to abrasion, impact and wear.
• Unit weight / density — affects dead load and, indirectly, the section required.

3. Affecting Durability

• Porosity and permeability — control ingress of water, harmful salts and chemicals.
• Weathering resistance — resistance to frost action, wetting–drying and thermal cycling.
• Chemical resistance — resistance to sulphates, chlorides, acids and alkali–aggregate reaction.
• Resistance to abrasion and erosion — important for floors, pavements and hydraulic structures.
• Corrosion resistance — for steel, and protection of steel by adequate concrete cover and density.
• Fire resistance — non-combustibility and retention of strength at high temperature.
• Dimensional stability — low shrinkage, creep and thermal movement, preventing cracking.

4. Affecting Serviceability

• Workability / ease of handling — ease of mixing, placing, compacting and finishing (concrete slump, mortar plasticity).
• Water tightness / impermeability — for roofs, tanks, dams and basements.
• Thermal and acoustic insulation — comfort and functional performance of the structure.
• Durability of surface finish — retention of appearance and function over the design life.
• Soundness — freedom from volume changes (unsound lime, unsound cement, efflorescence in bricks).
• Maintenance requirement — low maintenance indicates good serviceability.

---

Characteristics of Good Quality Bricks

1. Shape and size — uniform, rectangular, with sharp, well-defined edges and parallel faces; standard size 230 mm × 110 mm × 70 mm (nominal 240 × 120 × 75 mm with mortar).
2. Colour — uniform, deep red or cherry red (copper colour); free from black or grey patches.
3. Texture — close, compact and fine-grained structure, free from cracks, lumps, stones and organic matter.
4. Strength — minimum compressive strength of 10.5 N/mm² (as per IS 1077 / NS for common burnt clay bricks); sufficient to carry design loads.
5. Water absorption — not more than 20% by weight for first class bricks (generally 15–20%); excess absorption indicates porosity and weakness.
6. Soundness — when two bricks are struck together, they give a clear ringing/metallic sound; a dull sound indicates cracks or poor burning.
7. Hardness — sufficiently hard; a scratch with a fingernail should not leave any impression.
8. Fire resistance — good fire resistance; bricks should not burn or lose strength appreciably at high temperature.
9. Efflorescence — should be free from soluble salts; no white patches when soaked and dried.
10. Thermal and sound insulation — adequate insulation against heat and sound for comfort.
11. Workability — should be easily cut, dressed and laid, and should bond well with mortar.
12. Durability — resistant to weathering action, frost, and alternate wetting and drying.
13. Frog — a first class brick should have a frog (indentation) of about 10–20 mm on one face for proper keying with mortar.

Limit State Design — Concept and Criteria

Concept of Limit State Design

Limit state design (LSD) is a design philosophy in which a structure is proportioned so that it remains fit for its intended use throughout its design life, i.e. it does not become unserviceable or unsafe at any stage. A limit state is defined as the condition at which a structure or a structural element ceases to fulfil the function for which it was designed.

Unlike the older working stress method (which checks stresses against allowable stresses under service loads) and the ultimate load method (which checks only the ultimate strength), limit state design examines both the safety and the serviceability requirements, using partial safety factors applied separately to loads and to material strengths. The design is based on probability concepts — loads and resistances are treated as random variables, and the structure is designed so that the probability of reaching an unfavourable limit state remains acceptably small.

The general design requirement is expressed as:

$S_d \le R_d$

where $S_d$ = design value of the effect of actions (moment, shear, axial force, deflection, crack width, etc.) and $R_d$ = design value of the corresponding resistance of the member.

The design values are obtained as:

$S_d = \gamma_f \times S_k \qquad R_d = \frac{R_k}{\gamma_m}$

where $\gamma_f$ = partial safety factor for loads (accounting for load variability and load combination), $\gamma_m$ = partial safety factor for materials (accounting for material variability and construction tolerances), and the subscript $k$ denotes characteristic values.

Limit states are broadly classified into two groups:

1. Limit state of collapse (ultimate limit state) — concerns safety of life and property.
2. Limit state of serviceability — concerns the functional performance and durability of the structure.

---

A. Limit State of Collapse (Ultimate Limit State)

This limit state corresponds to the maximum load-carrying capacity of the structure. The structure is deemed to have reached this state when it collapses, or when it becomes unstable or partially fails. The following aspects must be examined:

(i) Flexure (Bending) The member must have adequate flexural strength so that the design moment $M_u$ does not exceed the ultimate moment of resistance $M_{u,\lim}$ of the section. The section may be designed as under-reinforced (ductile failure, preferred) or balanced; over-reinforced sections are avoided as failure is brittle. For a singly reinforced rectangular section:

$M_u = 0.87 f_y A_{st} \left(d - 0.42\,x_u\right), \qquad x_u = \frac{0.87 f_y A_{st}}{0.36 f_{ck} b}$

(ii) Shear The member must resist the design shear force $V_u$ without diagonal tension failure. Shear is resisted partly by concrete ($\tau_c b d$) and partly by shear reinforcement ($V_{sv}$):

$V_u \le V_c + V_{sv}, \qquad V_{sv} = \frac{0.87 f_y A_{sv} d}{s_v}$

A maximum shear stress limit ($\tau_{c,max}$) must also be satisfied to prevent web crushing.

(iii) Compression (Axial and Combined) Columns and struts must be checked for axial compression, combined axial load and bending, and slenderness effects (additional moments due to buckling). Short columns are designed by the axial load–moment interaction, while slender columns require magnification of moments.

(iv) Torsion Members subjected to twisting moments must be designed for torsional shear stress and the equivalent shear and bending arising from torsion, with adequate closed stirrups and longitudinal steel.

(v) Bond and Anchorage Adequate development length $L_d$ and anchorage must be provided so that the bar force is transferred to concrete without slipping or pull-out failure:

$L_d = \frac{\phi \sigma_s}{4 \tau_{bd}}$

(vi) Stability against Overturning and Sliding Retaining walls, abutments and similar structures must be checked for overturning (factor of safety against overturning) and sliding (factor of safety against sliding), and for bearing pressure on soil.

(vii) Overall Stability / Buckling The structure as a whole and its compression members must be checked against buckling, lateral instability and progressive collapse.

---

B. Limit State of Serviceability

This limit state concerns the performance of the structure under service (working) loads. The following criteria must be examined:

(i) Deflection Deflection under service loads must not exceed permissible limits, as excessive deflection causes cracking of finishes, misalignment of machinery, discomfort to occupants and damage to non-structural elements. As per IS 456, the limits are:

• Vertical deflection: span/250 for total deflection, and span/350 (or 20 mm, whichever is less) for deflection after erection of partitions.
• Horizontal deflection: height/500 for the storey, height/250 for the building as a whole.

(ii) Cracking Crack width at the tension face must be limited to preserve appearance and durability and to protect reinforcement from corrosion. The limiting crack width is generally taken as 0.3 mm for members exposed to mild conditions and 0.2 mm for severe exposure. Cracks are controlled by limiting steel stress, providing adequate cover and distributing reinforcement.

(iii) Vibration Excessive vibration causes discomfort to occupants and damage to finishes. Vibration is controlled by limiting deflection and by ensuring adequate stiffness and mass of the member (relevant for floors, footbridges and machine foundations).

(iv) Durability The structure must resist environmental attack (carbonation, chloride ingress, sulphate attack, freezing–thawing) over its design life. This is ensured by adequate concrete cover, minimum cement content, limiting water–cement ratio, grade of concrete and quality control.

(v) Fire Resistance The member must retain its function during and after a fire for the required fire-resistance period. This is achieved by adequate cover to reinforcement, member thickness and concrete cover to steel, as specified in the fire code.

(vi) Fatigue For structures subjected to repeated or cyclic loading (bridges, crane girders, machine foundations), the stress range must be limited to avoid fatigue failure.

(vii) Other functional requirements These include water-tightness (water tanks, basements), acoustic and thermal performance, and aesthetic appearance of the finished surface.

---

Summary

Limit state design ensures that a structure satisfies both the safety requirement (limit state of collapse — flexure, shear, compression, torsion, bond, stability) and the serviceability requirement (deflection, cracking, vibration, durability, fire, fatigue) under the action of factored loads, using partial safety factors for loads and materials. This dual check makes LSD a more rational, economical and reliable method than the working stress method.