Chapter 9
Governance and Public Administration
Lok Sewa Aayog (Public Service Commission) past exam questions
Past questions and answers
1 question set from this chapter. Most repeated first.
- 2080 · 2nd · 15 marks
The preamble of the Constitution of Nepal has emphasized for the fulfillment of the aspiration of Good Governance, development and prosperity in the nation. However, the global indicators of Good Governance (including CPI) don't show the encouraging results. Besides the public sector governance, the Corporate Governance and CSR also in question as the private sector performances are not satisfactory as per the public sentiments. In this context:
a) What are the cruxes of the problem for achieving the Good Governance (in both public and private sector) in Nepal?
b) What are the legal and institutional frameworks in this regards? Explain with strength and weakness of them.
c) Make recommendations with action plan for the achievement of Good Governance (in both public and private sector) in Nepal?
5+5+5=15
Answer
a) Cruxes of the Problem for Achieving Good Governance in Nepal
Public Sector
- Political instability and instability of institutions — frequent changes of government, transfer of civil servants, and lack of continuity in policy weaken accountability and long-term planning.
- Weak rule of law and impunity — delayed justice, politicisation of law enforcement, and non-enforcement of anti-corruption laws encourage corruption (reflected in Nepal's low Corruption Perceptions Index rank).
- Rampant corruption and rent-seeking — in public procurement, revenue administration, land registration, and licensing.
- Weak accountability institutions — CIAA, OAG, and parliamentary committees lack enforcement teeth; audit reports are not acted upon.
- Politicisation of the bureaucracy — merit-based recruitment and promotion are undermined by political patronage; transfer and posting are used as rewards.
- Weak service delivery and citizen interface — red tape, discretionary powers, poor e-governance, and lack of grievance redressal.
- Fiscal indiscipline and poor project management — cost overruns, duplication of projects, and low capital expenditure.
- Exclusion and inequality — marginalised groups (Dalits, women, Madhesis, Janajatis) remain under-represented in decision-making.
- Weak local governance capacity — newly formed local levels lack technical manpower, resources, and clarity of intergovernmental relations.
- Lack of transparency — poor access to information, weak citizen participation, and inadequate social accountability mechanisms.
Private Sector (Corporate Governance and CSR)
- Concentration of ownership and family-dominated boards — weak separation of ownership and management; boards act as rubber stamps.
- Weak regulatory enforcement — OCR, SEBON, and NEPSE lack capacity and independence; penalties are negligible.
- Weak CSR practice — CSR is treated as charity or publicity rather than strategic responsibility; reporting is not mandatory or audited outside the banking sector.
- Tax evasion, transfer pricing, and informal economy — large informal sector escapes governance scrutiny.
- Poor disclosure and transparency — financial statements are often not timely, comparable, or reliable.
- Weak audit and internal control — auditors lack independence; related-party transactions go unchecked.
- Collusion between business and politics — policy capture, syndicates, and cartels distort fair competition.
- Low stakeholder protection — minority shareholders, workers, consumers, and communities have weak voice.
- Lack of a strong, enforceable CG code — guidelines and directives are not followed in practice.
- Limited CSR impact — spending is scattered, unmeasured, and disconnected from SDGs.
Root crux: The gap between formal legal provisions and actual enforcement, driven by political patronage, weak institutions, and a culture of impunity — in both sectors.
b) Legal and Institutional Frameworks: Strengths and Weaknesses
Public Sector
| Framework | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|
| Constitution of Nepal (2015) — Art. 51 (good governance directive principles), Art. 27 (right to information), Art. 239 (CIAA) | Strong constitutional mandate; fundamental rights; federal structure | Directive principles non-justiciable; slow implementation |
| Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority Act, 1991 (2048 BS) | Independent constitutional body; investigates corruption | Limited prosecution power; political interference; low conviction rate |
| Office of the Auditor General (OAG) | Annual audit of all public bodies; constitutional body | Reports not binding; follow-up poor |
| Public Procurement Act, 2007 | Transparent bidding rules; e-GP system | Loopholes; collusion; weak monitoring |
| Civil Service Act, 1993 | Merit-based recruitment; PSC oversight | Politicisation; transfer abuse; outdated |
| Right to Information Act, 2007 | Citizen access to information | Weak enforcement; exemptions misused |
| Local Government Operation Act, 2017 | Decentralised governance; local accountability | Capacity gaps; unclear federal-local relations |
| National Vigilance Centre | Coordination on corruption | Low visibility; limited authority |
Private Sector
| Framework | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|
| Companies Act, 2006 | Board structure; audit requirements; shareholder and director duties | No general CSR mandate; weak penalties |
| Securities Act, 2006 & SEBON | Regulates listed companies; disclosure norms | SEBON capacity; enforcement gaps |
| Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) | Regulates banks; CG guidelines for banks | Only banks; non-bank sectors uncovered |
| Insurance Act, 2079 (2022) and Nepal Insurance Authority directives | Regulates insurers; solvency, governance and disclosure rules | Weak enforcement; limited supervisory capacity |
| NRB directives on CSR | Banks and financial institutions must set aside a share of net profit (about 1 percent) for CSR | Limited to BFIs; spending scattered; no impact assessment |
| SEBON Corporate Governance Directive for listed companies | Board, audit committee and disclosure norms | Compliance is weak; penalties are small |
| OCR (Office of Company Registrar) | Registration and oversight | Limited inspection capacity |
Overall weakness: Overlapping mandates, weak enforcement, political interference, and lack of a unified CG/CSR monitoring body.
c) Recommendations with Action Plan for Achieving Good Governance
Recommendations
Public Sector
- Strengthen rule of law — fast-track courts, judicial reform, and strict enforcement of anti-corruption laws.
- Depoliticise the bureaucracy — fixed tenure for civil servants; merit-based promotion; independent PSC oversight.
- Enhance accountability — mandatory follow-up of OAG and CIAA reports; publish action taken.
- Expand e-governance — digital service delivery, online grievance redressal, and open data.
- Empower local governments — capacity building, clear fiscal transfers, and social accountability tools.
- Promote inclusive governance — affirmative action for marginalised groups.
- Institutionalise citizen participation — public hearings, citizen charters, and participatory budgeting.
Private Sector
- Mandatory CSR reporting — amend company law to require audited CSR reports linked to SDGs.
- Strengthen CG code — make key provisions mandatory and introduce penalties for non-compliance.
- Enhance regulatory capacity — strengthen SEBON, NRB, and OCR with skilled manpower and technology.
- Promote board independence — independent directors; audit committees; whistleblower protection.
- Encourage ethical business — tax compliance, fair competition, and anti-cartel measures.
- Link CSR with SDGs — incentivise strategic CSR through tax benefits and recognition.
- Establish a unified CG/CSR monitoring body — coordinate across sectors.
Action Plan (3-Year)
| Phase | Timeframe | Key Actions | Responsible |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short-term | 0–12 months | Amend company law for mandatory CSR reporting; strengthen CIAA/OAG follow-up; launch e-governance portals; publish citizen charters | MoF, MoHA, CIAA, OAG, SEBON |
| Medium-term | 12–24 months | Depoliticise transfers; capacity building of local governments; introduce CG scorecard for listed companies; whistleblower policy | PSC, MoF, SEBON, NRB |
| Long-term | 24–36 months | Judicial reform; unified CG/CSR authority; SDG-linked CSR incentives; annual Good Governance Index | PMO, MoF, MoLA, Private Sector |
Monitoring & Evaluation
- Annual Good Governance Index (public + private sector)
- Citizen feedback surveys and social audits
- Parliamentary oversight of CIAA/OAG reports
- Public disclosure of CG/CSR compliance
Conclusion: Good governance in Nepal requires political will, institutional strengthening, legal enforcement, and active citizen participation — in both the public and private sectors — to translate constitutional aspirations into real prosperity.
Answer checked by Claude Sonnet · Oct 21, 2026
Test yourself · 2 MCQs
Loading…
Questions from RBCL Lok Sewa Executive Manager 7th Level Exam Question (Executive Manager "Nayab Byabasthapak" 7th Level · 2nd · 2080) and Rastriya Beema Company Executive Level Exam Question (Executive Manager (Level 7) · 3rd Paper · 2080). Answers are written for this site; check them against your class notes.