Skip to main content

Chapter 9

Governance and Public Administration

Lok Sewa Aayog (Public Service Commission) past exam questions

Past questions and answers

1 question set from this chapter. Most repeated first.

  • 2080 · 2nd · 15 marks

The preamble of the Constitution of Nepal has emphasized for the fulfillment of the aspiration of Good Governance, development and prosperity in the nation. However, the global indicators of Good Governance (including CPI) don't show the encouraging results. Besides the public sector governance, the Corporate Governance and CSR also in question as the private sector performances are not satisfactory as per the public sentiments. In this context:
a) What are the cruxes of the problem for achieving the Good Governance (in both public and private sector) in Nepal?
b) What are the legal and institutional frameworks in this regards? Explain with strength and weakness of them.
c) Make recommendations with action plan for the achievement of Good Governance (in both public and private sector) in Nepal?
5+5+5=15

Answer

a) Cruxes of the Problem for Achieving Good Governance in Nepal

Public Sector

  1. Political instability and instability of institutions — frequent changes of government, transfer of civil servants, and lack of continuity in policy weaken accountability and long-term planning.
  2. Weak rule of law and impunity — delayed justice, politicisation of law enforcement, and non-enforcement of anti-corruption laws encourage corruption (reflected in Nepal's low Corruption Perceptions Index rank).
  3. Rampant corruption and rent-seeking — in public procurement, revenue administration, land registration, and licensing.
  4. Weak accountability institutions — CIAA, OAG, and parliamentary committees lack enforcement teeth; audit reports are not acted upon.
  5. Politicisation of the bureaucracy — merit-based recruitment and promotion are undermined by political patronage; transfer and posting are used as rewards.
  6. Weak service delivery and citizen interface — red tape, discretionary powers, poor e-governance, and lack of grievance redressal.
  7. Fiscal indiscipline and poor project management — cost overruns, duplication of projects, and low capital expenditure.
  8. Exclusion and inequality — marginalised groups (Dalits, women, Madhesis, Janajatis) remain under-represented in decision-making.
  9. Weak local governance capacity — newly formed local levels lack technical manpower, resources, and clarity of intergovernmental relations.
  10. Lack of transparency — poor access to information, weak citizen participation, and inadequate social accountability mechanisms.

Private Sector (Corporate Governance and CSR)

  1. Concentration of ownership and family-dominated boards — weak separation of ownership and management; boards act as rubber stamps.
  2. Weak regulatory enforcement — OCR, SEBON, and NEPSE lack capacity and independence; penalties are negligible.
  3. Weak CSR practice — CSR is treated as charity or publicity rather than strategic responsibility; reporting is not mandatory or audited outside the banking sector.
  4. Tax evasion, transfer pricing, and informal economy — large informal sector escapes governance scrutiny.
  5. Poor disclosure and transparency — financial statements are often not timely, comparable, or reliable.
  6. Weak audit and internal control — auditors lack independence; related-party transactions go unchecked.
  7. Collusion between business and politics — policy capture, syndicates, and cartels distort fair competition.
  8. Low stakeholder protection — minority shareholders, workers, consumers, and communities have weak voice.
  9. Lack of a strong, enforceable CG code — guidelines and directives are not followed in practice.
  10. Limited CSR impact — spending is scattered, unmeasured, and disconnected from SDGs.

Root crux: The gap between formal legal provisions and actual enforcement, driven by political patronage, weak institutions, and a culture of impunity — in both sectors.


b) Legal and Institutional Frameworks: Strengths and Weaknesses

Public Sector

FrameworkStrengthsWeaknesses
Constitution of Nepal (2015) — Art. 51 (good governance directive principles), Art. 27 (right to information), Art. 239 (CIAA)Strong constitutional mandate; fundamental rights; federal structureDirective principles non-justiciable; slow implementation
Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority Act, 1991 (2048 BS)Independent constitutional body; investigates corruptionLimited prosecution power; political interference; low conviction rate
Office of the Auditor General (OAG)Annual audit of all public bodies; constitutional bodyReports not binding; follow-up poor
Public Procurement Act, 2007Transparent bidding rules; e-GP systemLoopholes; collusion; weak monitoring
Civil Service Act, 1993Merit-based recruitment; PSC oversightPoliticisation; transfer abuse; outdated
Right to Information Act, 2007Citizen access to informationWeak enforcement; exemptions misused
Local Government Operation Act, 2017Decentralised governance; local accountabilityCapacity gaps; unclear federal-local relations
National Vigilance CentreCoordination on corruptionLow visibility; limited authority

Private Sector

FrameworkStrengthsWeaknesses
Companies Act, 2006Board structure; audit requirements; shareholder and director dutiesNo general CSR mandate; weak penalties
Securities Act, 2006 & SEBONRegulates listed companies; disclosure normsSEBON capacity; enforcement gaps
Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB)Regulates banks; CG guidelines for banksOnly banks; non-bank sectors uncovered
Insurance Act, 2079 (2022) and Nepal Insurance Authority directivesRegulates insurers; solvency, governance and disclosure rulesWeak enforcement; limited supervisory capacity
NRB directives on CSRBanks and financial institutions must set aside a share of net profit (about 1 percent) for CSRLimited to BFIs; spending scattered; no impact assessment
SEBON Corporate Governance Directive for listed companiesBoard, audit committee and disclosure normsCompliance is weak; penalties are small
OCR (Office of Company Registrar)Registration and oversightLimited inspection capacity

Overall weakness: Overlapping mandates, weak enforcement, political interference, and lack of a unified CG/CSR monitoring body.


c) Recommendations with Action Plan for Achieving Good Governance

Recommendations

Public Sector

  1. Strengthen rule of law — fast-track courts, judicial reform, and strict enforcement of anti-corruption laws.
  2. Depoliticise the bureaucracy — fixed tenure for civil servants; merit-based promotion; independent PSC oversight.
  3. Enhance accountability — mandatory follow-up of OAG and CIAA reports; publish action taken.
  4. Expand e-governance — digital service delivery, online grievance redressal, and open data.
  5. Empower local governments — capacity building, clear fiscal transfers, and social accountability tools.
  6. Promote inclusive governance — affirmative action for marginalised groups.
  7. Institutionalise citizen participation — public hearings, citizen charters, and participatory budgeting.

Private Sector

  1. Mandatory CSR reporting — amend company law to require audited CSR reports linked to SDGs.
  2. Strengthen CG code — make key provisions mandatory and introduce penalties for non-compliance.
  3. Enhance regulatory capacity — strengthen SEBON, NRB, and OCR with skilled manpower and technology.
  4. Promote board independence — independent directors; audit committees; whistleblower protection.
  5. Encourage ethical business — tax compliance, fair competition, and anti-cartel measures.
  6. Link CSR with SDGs — incentivise strategic CSR through tax benefits and recognition.
  7. Establish a unified CG/CSR monitoring body — coordinate across sectors.

Action Plan (3-Year)

PhaseTimeframeKey ActionsResponsible
Short-term0–12 monthsAmend company law for mandatory CSR reporting; strengthen CIAA/OAG follow-up; launch e-governance portals; publish citizen chartersMoF, MoHA, CIAA, OAG, SEBON
Medium-term12–24 monthsDepoliticise transfers; capacity building of local governments; introduce CG scorecard for listed companies; whistleblower policyPSC, MoF, SEBON, NRB
Long-term24–36 monthsJudicial reform; unified CG/CSR authority; SDG-linked CSR incentives; annual Good Governance IndexPMO, MoF, MoLA, Private Sector

Monitoring & Evaluation

  • Annual Good Governance Index (public + private sector)
  • Citizen feedback surveys and social audits
  • Parliamentary oversight of CIAA/OAG reports
  • Public disclosure of CG/CSR compliance

Conclusion: Good governance in Nepal requires political will, institutional strengthening, legal enforcement, and active citizen participation — in both the public and private sectors — to translate constitutional aspirations into real prosperity.

Answer checked by Claude Sonnet · Oct 21, 2026

Test yourself · 2 MCQs

Loading…

Questions from RBCL Lok Sewa Executive Manager 7th Level Exam Question (Executive Manager "Nayab Byabasthapak" 7th Level · 2nd · 2080) and Rastriya Beema Company Executive Level Exam Question (Executive Manager (Level 7) · 3rd Paper · 2080). Answers are written for this site; check them against your class notes.